Wiretapping as a Form of Coercion in Criminal Procedure Law in Indonesia
Keywords:
Tapping, Coercive Efforts, Criminal Procedure LawAbstract
The rapid development of the times is very likely to accompany the development of crimes committed through technology. In order to uncover crimes through technology, wiretapping is one tool that can be used. However, legal regulations regarding wiretapping as a form of coercion still vary. According to the Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law, hereinafter referred to as “KUHAP”), forms of coercive measures only include arrest, detention, search, confiscation and examination of documents. Now, wiretapping is carried out to uncover specific criminal acts, for example corruption crimes. For this reason, in the future, legal reform regarding wiretapping is a necessity. This seems to be supported by the Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, hereinafter referred to as “MKRI”) Decision Number 5/PUU-VIII/2010, dated February 2, 2011, which considers the need for a special law that regulates wiretapping in general as well as wiretapping procedures for each authorized institution.
References
Christianto, Hwian. “Tindakan Penyadapan Ditinjau Dari Prespektif Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS 5, no. 2 (2016).
Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo. “Mengurai Pengaturan Penyadapan Dalam Rancangan KUHAP.” Jurnal Teropong 1 (2014).
Fitria, Raissa Anita. “Penyadapan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana.” Mimbar Keadilan (2017).
Hidayat, Muhammad Arif. “Penyadapan Oleh Penyidik Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Prespektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Badamai Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2019).
Iftitahsari. Mengatur Ulang Penyadapan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Meninjau Praktik-Praktik Terbaik Pengaturan Penyadapan Di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2020.
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. “Menata Kembali Hukum Penyadapan Di Indonesia.” Last modified 2012. Accessed May 31, 2020. https://icjr.or.id/menata-kembali-hukum-penyadapan-di-indonesia/.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Putusan Nomor 5/PUU-VIII/2010, Tanggal 2 Februari 2011,” n.d.
Rachmad, Andi. “Legalitas Penyadapan Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 11, no. 2 (2016).
Rizal, Moch Choirul. Kajian-Kajian Tentang Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Cirebon: LovRinz Publishing, 2015.
Rizal, Moch Choirul. “Kebijakan Hukum Tentang Bantuan Hukum Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 4, no. 1 (2018): 147–171.
Rizal, Moch Choirul. “Restatement Terhadap Konsep Dalam Hukum Tentang Keluarga Sesuai Kewenangan Mengadili Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia.” Repository Publikasi Ilmiah. Last modified 2019. Accessed August 18, 2020. https://repositori.in/index.php/repo/article/view/5.
Salim, Hardy, Monica Kurnia, and Nada Dwi Azhari. “Analisis Keabsahan Penyadapan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Tanpa Izin Pengadilan.” Adil 9, no. 2 (2018).
Utiarahman, Andre Putra. “Upaya Paksa Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen 8, no. 10 (2019).
