Putusan Verstek Pengadilan Agama Pada Cerai Talak Perspektif Keadilan Gender

Authors

  • Abdullah Taufik IAIN Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v2i2.85

Keywords:

Divorce, Verstek Verdict, Gender Equality

Abstract

Verstek’s decision is one of the court legal products that can have permanent legal force if there is no resistance effort (Verzet) from the defendant Verstek’s decision was dropped by a judge because the Tegugat (Respondent) who had been summoned should not come without giving reasons that could be justified by law. The verstek decision is based on article 126 HIR (Herzien Inlandsch  Reglement)  which states;

  1. The absence of the defendant at the first hearing immediately gave the judge the authority to decide on the verstek
  2. Resign the session and call the defendant once again

Verstek’s decision which is an item of civil procedural law in general is also applied in the civil procedure law of the religious court. Therefore, in dealing with civil divorce cases in religious courts, judges can apply the verstek verdict. negative impact on the wife because in the verstek decision the wife is in a weak position, so that with the verstek verdict she has lost her right to defend herself, even though there is an opportunity to fight (Verzet) but it depends on the quality of the personnel from in terms of economics and education, judges must therefore be wiser in imposing Verstek decisions on divorce divorce cases so that there is an opportunity for the wife to provide information related to her personality so as to create gender equality in the court.

References

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Menguak Teori Hukum dan Teori Keadilan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.

Teori Hukum dan Teori Peradilan termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Kencana Permata, Media Group, 2009.

Abdulmanan dkk. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Pengadilan Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 2002.

Ali, Chaidir. Yurisprodensi Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Bandung: Al-Ma’arif, 1979.

Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2003.

Bagus, Lorens. Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2002.

Fakih, Mansour. Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1997.

Harahap, Yahya. Kedudukan Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2001.

Jamal, Abdul. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2000.

Kusumo, Sudikno Merto. Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar). Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003

Puspitawati, H. Pengenalan Konsep Gender, dan Keadilan Gender, Makalah Disampaikan pada Rapat Koordinasi Kesetaraan Gender Se-Wil I Bogor, Kamis, 22 Maret 2012.

Raharjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Rato, Dominikus. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2017.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Harvard: University Masacusetts, 1971.

R., Soeroso. Yurisprodensi Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan dan Surat Gugatan.

Sarwono. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2011.

Sriwardah. dkk. Hukum Acara Perdata dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gama Media. 2007.

UU Perkawinan di Indonesia, Surabaya: Arkola Tanpa Tahun

Downloads

Published

2022-06-07

How to Cite

Taufik, A. (2022). Putusan Verstek Pengadilan Agama Pada Cerai Talak Perspektif Keadilan Gender. Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 2(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v2i2.85

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.