Kompetensi Pengadilan Agama dalam Menangani Perkara Warisan Beda Agama (Analisis Perkara 1854/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Plg)

Authors

  • Hanifah Salma Muhammad UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Malik Ibrahim UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v7i1.184

Keywords:

competence of religious courts, Inheritance of different religions

Abstract

This article discusses the competence of religious courts in adjudicating disputes over interfaith inheritance between Muslims and non-Muslims. This can happen inseparably from the social and cultural conditions of people in Indonesia who are pluralism with various backgrounds such as ethnicity, customs, different languages, and belief or religious factors. But on the other hand, there are differences in views between the fuqaha regarding the heritage of different religions. If the heir and heir, both the heir as the plaintiff and the defendant, have differences in religion, then the practice of law enforcement in the court against the inheritance case creates a dispute over competence between the religious court and the district court. This study examines through legislation, legal literature in accordance with the research being discussed and uses Islamic law to answer the author's problem formulation by analyzing decision number 1854 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PA.Plg. The results of the research that can be concluded are that when viewed from a juridical point of view, religious courts are authorized to adjudicate cases of disputes over inheritance between religions. This can happen because it is based on jurisprudence 51K/AG/1999. The function of jurisprudence can be used as the best way given by judges to communities that have family pluralism as a solution in resolving cases of inheritance disputes between religions. However, when viewed from the normative side of Islamic law, religious courts are authorized to adjudicate inheritance disputes with parties of different religions. This can happen because it is based on the interpretation of Yusuf Al-Qardawi and the ijtihad of the supreme court for a sense of justice for families whose pluralism of beliefs. The inheritance is not counted as heirs but is counted as a mandatory will of no more than 1/3 part.

References

Abdul Ḥusain Muslim bin al-Ḥajāj, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, kitab al-Farāiḍu, ḥadīṡ No. 1614. (Riyaḍ: Bait al-Afkār adDauliyyah, 1998 M.

Abu Muhammad Hasan bin Abdurrahman bin Khald Ar-Ramahurmuzi al-Farisi, Almuhadis al-fasil baina rawwiy wal wa’i, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr), Cet.3, 1440,Juz 1.

Al-Bukhari, Shahih al-Bukhari, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr). Lihat petikan Hadis No. 6267.

Al-Jauziyah, Ibnu Qayyim, Ahkam Ahl alDzimmahI (Beirut: Daru Ibnu Hazm), 1418 H.

Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf Fatwa-fatwa Kontemporer, alih bahasa As’ad Yasin, cet-5.Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1997.

Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. Fatwa-fatwa Kontemporer, penerjemah Abdul Hayyi, cet-3, Jakarta: Gema Insasni Press, 2002.

Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. Fiqih Maqashid Syar’i, (Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar), 2007.

Al-Salabiy, Ahmad Musthafa. Ahkam alMawarits, (Beirut: Dar al-Nahdhah alArabiyah) 1978.

Al-Shabuni, Muhammad Ali. Pembagian Waris Menurut Islam. (Jakarta: Gema Insani Pers) 2001.

Al-Syafi’I, Muhammad bin Idris. Al-Umm, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr), 1402 H. Al-Syaukani, Muhammad. Nailul Authar, (Kairo: Maktabah al-Salafiyah), 1374 H.

Ahmad Azhar Bazhar Basyir, Hukum Waris Islam,Yogyakarta, Universitas Islam Indonesia, 1990.

Arto, Mukti, Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar,1996.

Baihaki, Ahmad, “Penerapan Wasiat Wajibah Dalam Putusan Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Beda Agama Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Islam”, Krtha Bhayangkara vol. 15, No. 1, (2021).

Basah, Sjachran, Mengenai Peradilan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1995.

Departemen Agama, Al-Qur’an Terjemah AsSalam, Jakarta: Al Huda, 2015.

Hanifah Salma Muhammad, Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama Untuk Mengadili Sengketa Warisan Beda Agama: Studi Terhadap Perkara Nomor 1854/Pdt.G/2013/PA.plg, Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2022.

Henri, “Pengertian dan macam-macam kompetensi badan peradilan”, https://butew.com/2018/10/15/pengerti an-dan-macam-macam-kompetensi-badan-peradilan/, akses 26 September 2021

Ibnu Majah, Sunan Ibnu Majah, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr).

Ibnu Qudamah, Abu Muhamad Abdulah bin Ahmad. Al-Mughni Vol.7, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr) 1404 H.

Irine Dian Ayu Dewanty,Prof.Dr. Suhariningsih, SH.,SU.,Siti Hamidah,SH.MM, “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 16/K/AG/2010 Pada Kasus Waris Berbeda Agama Berdasarkan Pasal 171 Huruf C Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, (2015).

Ilham Thohari, Konflik Kewenangan Antara Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menangani Perkara Sengketa Waris Orang Islam, (Universum: Vol. 9 No.2 Juli 2015).

Istiarini Cahyaningsih, “Analisa Putusan Pengadilan Agama Depok Tentang Ahli Waris Beda Agama Dan Perkara Yang Diputus Secara Ultra Petita (Perkara Nomor 318/Pdt.G/2006/Pa.Dpk)”, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, (2010).

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia versi online,” https://kbbi.web.id/pengadilan, akses 29 September 2021.

Khoiruddin Nasution, Pengantar Studi Islam Dilengkapi Pendekatan IntergratifInterkonektif (Multisipliner), Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2016.

Kompilasi Hukum Islam

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata, Yogyakarta: Liberty,Yogyakarta 1988.

Muḥammad bin Isma’il al-Bukhārī, Al-Jāmi’u Aṣ-Ṣaḥīḥu , kitab al-‘Ilmi, bab kitābah al- ‘Ilmi. Kitab al-Farāiḍ, (t.t.p:Dār Ṭauq an-Najāh, 1422).

Muhammad Isna Wahyudi, Penegakan Kewarisan Beda Agama, (Jurnal Komisi Yudisial, 2015)

M. Rasyid Ridha, Tafsir al-Manar, (Kairo: Dar al-Manar, 1973), V. 466; Departemen Agama RI., al-Qur'an dan Tafsirnya, (Yogyakarta: Dana Bhakti Wakaf, t.t.), IV. 326; Ahmad Mustafa al-Maragi, Tafsir al-Maragi, (Mesir: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi, 1974), V. 185; Majelis Tarjih dan Pengembangan Pemikiran Islam PP Muhammadiyah, Tafsir Tematik alQur'an Tentang Hubungan Sosial Antar umat Beragama,Yogyakarta: Pustaka SM, 2000.

Nurnaningsih Amriani, Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Press, 2011.

Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI, 2010.

Putusan Tingkat Pertama 1854/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Plg.

Ramulyo, M Idris, Beberapa Masalah tentang Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Ind Hill Co, 1999.

Salma Suroyya Yuni Yanti, Mulyadi, Yunanto, “Pembagian Harta Warisan Terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Serta Akibat Hukumnya”, Diponegoro Law Jurnal Volume 5, Nomor 3, (2016).

Tiara Meidialita, “Sengketa Harta Warisan Antara Para Ahli Waris Yang Berbeda Agama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Nomor 1578/Pdt.G/2010/PAJT), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya, (2019).

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945

Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama

Undang-undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 undang-undang perubahan pertama atas Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama

Undang-undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan kedua atas Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama.

Yurisprudensi 51K/AG/1999

https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/yurisp rudensi/detail/11eadf086b586f509ef93 23230333034.html akses 31 Desember 2021

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

How to Cite

Muhammad, H. S., & Ibrahim, M. . (2023). Kompetensi Pengadilan Agama dalam Menangani Perkara Warisan Beda Agama (Analisis Perkara 1854/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Plg). Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 7(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v7i1.184

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.